Gravity, as most science topics, is dominated by what I call Newtonian ideas. These ideas are born of effects as from sensorial inputs. They are not of awareness of cause (principles and laws) but of perceived phenomena. An apple is seen to fall to the ground from its tree and it is assumed gravity is a pull to the earth. Gravity, according to some, is in actuality a quantity of density (a resultant condition of unseen causes) seeking its level of equalization within differing zones of density. It will shy away from zones of lesser density and seek zones of equal or higher density. The difference lies in our comprehension of 'density' or polar attractiveness versus 'tenuity' or depolar dispersive conditions establishing those zones.

Sir Isaac Newton: "That one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of any thing else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to the other, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking, can ever fall into it."

Newton did not consider sub-quantum phenomena such as sympathy and its resultant mutual attraction resulting in dense matter nor did he understand the true nature of vacuum as mutual dispersion or space...